PrintEmailAdd to Personalized Information Packet

Media Center

Please use the form below to search for any relevant publications pertaining to your specific needs.  If you would like to be added to Kramer Levin's publications distribution list, please click onto the Publications Sign Up in the right side bar.

Advertising Litigation Report: Vol. 2, No. 2

April 20, 2017

In this issue:

Lanham Act False Advertising

  • Summary Judgment Affirmed for Defendant in Lanham Act Challenge to Statements Concerning Popularity of Advertiser’s Product, Scarcity of Challenger’s Product
  • District Court Adopts Report and Recommendation, Denies Judgment on the Pleadings, in Lanham Act Suit Challenging ‘Same Quality’ Claim
  • Reputational Injury Arising From Unauthorized Use of Likeness May Support Lanham Act Liability
  • Court Rejects Lanham Act Claim Premised on Future Advertising by Nonparties

Consumer Fraud Class Action

  • House Passes Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017 H.R.985 — 115th Congress
  • Ninth Circuit: Plaintiffs Need Not Prove Administratively Feasible Method of Identifying Class Members to Establish Ascertainability
  • Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Class Certification Where Plaintiff Fails to Establish Administratively Feasible Method of Identifying Class Members
  • Disclaimer Accurately Qualified Ads for Beer
  • Seventh Circuit Rejects Class Alleging That ‘Unnecessarily Large’ Eye Drops Were Premium Priced
  • Ninth Circuit: Consumers Cannot Be Misled Into Believing That Bud Light Lime-A-Rita Is a Low-Calorie Beer

National Advertising Division (NAD) and National Advertising Review Board (NARB)

  • NARB backs NAD’s actions in jurisdictional challenge from Colgate-Palmolive, but recommends ASRC re-examine certain rules in light of “the explosion of consumer class actions”
  • Advertiser to appeal after NAD advises certain claims regarding premium gasoline be discontinued
  • NAD recommends dietary supplement maker modify, discontinue certain claims, modify third-party product review practices
  • NAD cautions advertiser in use of before-and-after photos, recommending discontinuance of claims not supported by underlying studies while finding other uses of photos permissibly ‘aspirational’

Regulatory

  • Negative Option Marketing Enforcement Actions in Federal Court
  • Negative Option Enforcement Action Involving DirecTV Subscriber Contracts Settles on the Morning of Trial
  • Sixth Circuit Declines Review of FTC Adjudication of False Biodegradability Claims
  • Pulley Block Systems Distributor Agrees to Stop Misleading ‘Made in U.S.A.’ Claims

Consumer Privacy and Data Security

  • Judge Trims Proposed Class Action Over Wendy’s Data Breach
  • Winco Foods’ Motion to Dismiss Granted in FCRA-Disclosure Litigation
  • FTC Releases Guidelines for Businesses Targeted by Phishing Scams
  • Neiman Marcus Agrees to $1.6M Settlement in Data Breach Suit
  • Google Email-Scanning Settlement Rejected as ‘Unclear’ and ‘Inadequate’
  • Employee Training Continues to Be a Key Component for Corporate Cyber Health

Related Attorneys
Related Practices
  • Jennifer Manton
  • Kramer Levin
  • 212.715.7612
>