What Happens to the ‘Insured vs. Insured’ Exclusion After the St. Paul Mercury Decision?

Corporate partner Daniel A. Rabinowitz’s article, “What Happens to the ‘Insured vs. Insured’ Exclusion After the St. Paul Mercury Decision?” appeared in the Dec. 19, 2016 issue of Westlaw Journal. The article examines the recent decision of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. regarding the “insured vs. insured” exclusion in directors and officers insurance policies.

Corporate law clerk Audrey Seongah Kim assisted in the preparation of the article.